Taizong Posted November 8, 2008 Report Share Posted November 8, 2008 This question has wondered around my head for a long time. Anyone could please answer such a question? I have known, however, that Roman army seemed to rely on shock impact rather than using powerful missile troops as their mainstay, is this assessment true? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kosmo Posted November 8, 2008 Report Share Posted November 8, 2008 They would have confiscated the crossbow and throw the owner to the lions Crossbow would have not been very useful against the heavy armored and compact formations of roman infantry. Giving the slow reload it would be even lees useful then archery and archers could not stop roman or greek heavy infantry. Only horse archers that could keep their distance had an impact. Romans had siege weapons that were like huge crossbows. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flavius Claudius Iulianus Posted November 8, 2008 Report Share Posted November 8, 2008 The Romans did use the handheld manuballista later on though, didn't they? How often were they used and what were they used for? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Northern Neil Posted November 8, 2008 Report Share Posted November 8, 2008 I believe there is a stone carving showing a Pictish warrior using a crossbow. Also, the Osprey book 'Late Roman Infantryman' shows a a germanic infantryman carrying one (my books are still in boxes following recent house move, otherwise I would include pictures). In both instances these crossbows appear to be lighter weight ones than the high - medieval arbalests. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ASCLEPIADES Posted November 9, 2008 Report Share Posted November 9, 2008 (edited) They would have confiscated the crossbow and throw the owner to the lions Crossbow would have not been very useful against the heavy armored and compact formations of roman infantry. Giving the slow reload it would be even lees useful then archery and archers could not stop roman or greek heavy infantry. Only horse archers that could keep their distance had an impact. Romans had siege weapons that were like huge crossbows. Edited December 1, 2008 by ASCLEPIADES Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taizong Posted November 9, 2008 Author Report Share Posted November 9, 2008 (edited) But isn't it true that Romans did not encounter any kind of armies who had powerful bows like the Huns (known also Xiongnu in the East)? Is this the reason why Early Roman Army did not fight in loose formation? Also, I thought that cataphracts in those days did not have massive effects as seen in later period since the lack of stirrup? I believe there is a stone carving showing a Pictish warrior using a crossbow. Also, the Osprey book 'Late Roman Infantryman' shows a a germanic infantryman carrying one (my books are still in boxes following recent house move, otherwise I would include pictures). In both instances these crossbows appear to be lighter weight ones than the high - medieval arbalests. I think the Osprey makes a mistake, since crossbow should appear in Europe no lesser than 9th-10th century. The only powerful hand-held crossbows with magnificent trigger mechanism is of Qin-Han Empire, who possessed an entire different style of warfare to the Romans. Edited November 9, 2008 by Taizong Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caldrail Posted November 9, 2008 Report Share Posted November 9, 2008 I remember seeing a mention of crossbow-armed troops in roman times, either the late empire or byzantine era's. Not a common weapon. Although its true the crossbow is a slow loading weapon, and therefore suffers in utility against the ordinary bow, the potential power of a bolt impact is not to be underestimated. That is after all why crossbows were adopted in preference to the bow anyway, except perhaps for a more natural aiming method. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lanista Posted November 9, 2008 Report Share Posted November 9, 2008 That is after all why crossbows were adopted in preference to the bow anyway, except perhaps for a more natural aiming method. Well that and that fact that it didn't take a life time of training to learn how to use a crossbow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M. Porcius Cato Posted November 9, 2008 Report Share Posted November 9, 2008 Wasn't the Greek cross-bow (the gastrophetes, 'belly-shooter') used in siege defense in Syracusae? From a protected and fixed position of short range like that, the cross-bow seems awfully useful. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ASCLEPIADES Posted November 10, 2008 Report Share Posted November 10, 2008 (edited) The only powerful hand-held crossbows with magnificent trigger mechanism is of Qin-Han Empire, who possessed an entire different style of warfare to the Romans. Edited December 1, 2008 by ASCLEPIADES Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taizong Posted November 10, 2008 Author Report Share Posted November 10, 2008 I think the Osprey makes a mistake, since crossbow should appear in Europe no lesser than 9th-10th century. The only powerful hand-held crossbows with magnificent trigger mechanism is of Qin-Han Empire, who possessed an entire different style of warfare to the Romans. Nope; Osprey is right. The gastrophetes ("belly-shooter') quoted by MPC were presumably the first crossbows in the Meditherranean area and they appeared circa 400 BC. Hero of Alexandria left the best detailed description in his work Belopoeica (Βελοποιικά), among other war machines like catapults. Oh! Isee what does he mean! THanks But is it a siege weapons? By hand-held crossbow, I mean something like this one: http://www.weblo.com/asset_image/456349/62...estofchina.com/ Also how strong such a crossbow is (gastrophetes)? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ASCLEPIADES Posted November 10, 2008 Report Share Posted November 10, 2008 (edited) Wasn't the Greek cross-bow (the gastrophetes, 'belly-shooter') used in siege defense in Syracusae? From a protected and fixed position of short range like that, the cross-bow seems awfully useful. It seems quite likely. Edited December 1, 2008 by ASCLEPIADES Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ASCLEPIADES Posted November 10, 2008 Report Share Posted November 10, 2008 (edited) Also how strong such a crossbow is (gastrophetes)? Edited December 1, 2008 by ASCLEPIADES Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bryaxis Hecatee Posted November 10, 2008 Report Share Posted November 10, 2008 The earlier mention of a crossbow in military context of which I know in the Roman World is from the time of Julian the Apostate ( in his gallic campaign around 360 AD ) : i don't have the exact passage but it comes in his early carreer when, going to Gaul, he his escorted by "balistarii" and cavalery. Those balistarii are usually thought to be crossbows operators instead of siege engineers. Other than that I know of no mention of military crossbow in the roman period. On the other hand the use of crossbows for hunting is better knows and more informations about those is known ( I suppose the Daremberg and Saglio could be of use here ) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ASCLEPIADES Posted November 10, 2008 Report Share Posted November 10, 2008 (edited) The earlier mention of a crossbow in military context of which I know in the Roman World is from the time of Julian the Apostate ( in his gallic campaign around 360 AD ) : i don't have the exact passage but it comes in his early carreer when, going to Gaul, he his escorted by "balistarii" and cavalery. Those balistarii are usually thought to be crossbows operators instead of siege engineers. Other than that I know of no mention of military crossbow in the roman period. On the other hand the use of crossbows for hunting is better knows and more informations about those is known ( I suppose the Daremberg and Saglio could be of use here ) Edited December 1, 2008 by ASCLEPIADES Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.