ASCLEPIADES Posted September 4, 2007 Report Share Posted September 4, 2007 Salve! Maybe Marcus Tullius Cicero was not a New Man after all; the first recorded plebeian consul of the gens Tullia was Marcus Tullius Decula at 81 BC (673 AUC), 18 years before Cicero. Here comes Appian, Bellum Civilis Book I, Ch. XI, sec. C: "Nevertheless, as the form of the republic remained he allowed them to appoint consuls. Marcus Tullius and Cornelius Dolabella were chosen. But Sulla, like a reigning sovereign, was dictator over the consuls." However, it's always possible that they were from different families. It has been very difficult to find any information about MT Decula. Does somebody have any positive reference about the potential familiar relationship between these two consuls? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Primus Pilus Posted September 4, 2007 Report Share Posted September 4, 2007 Cicero doesn't claim any blood connection. Cic. de LegAgr II.14'35 and really only mentions him in passing. In the same work (as well as many others) he clearly claims to be a novus homo. (I fortuitously stumbled across this text while looking for the reference to Decula.) (de LegAgr. II.3) We can be fairly certain that if Cicero had consular heritage in his direct family, we would've known about it, and in fact his political drive for importance and acceptance may have been altered. If only the nomen mattered Cicero could've claimed lineage to Servius Tullius (the 6th King) and M. Tullius Longus (cos c.500 BC). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ASCLEPIADES Posted September 4, 2007 Author Report Share Posted September 4, 2007 (edited) Cicero doesn't claim any blood connection. Cic. de LegAgr II.14'35 and really only mentions him in passing. In the same work (as well as many others) he clearly claims to be a novus homo. (I fortuitously stumbled across this text while looking for the reference to Decula.) (de LegAgr. II.3) We can be fairly certain that if Cicero had consular heritage in his direct family, we would've known about it, and in fact his political drive for importance and acceptance may have been altered. If only the nomen mattered Cicero could've claimed lineage to Servius Tullius (the 6th King) and M. Tullius Longus (cos c.500 BC). Gratiam habeo, PP. IOU another. Edited September 4, 2007 by ASCLEPIADES Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.