Furt Posted March 4, 2007 Report Share Posted March 4, 2007 I am confused by the term Latifunda, and are unsure if they were a more "urban" invention or were found throughout the provinces. I believe they only existed in Italia, in and around Rome herself, but personally think some form of slave farming or industry had to exist in newly conquered provinces. If they did exist in the provinces would their rich politician owners personally run them (ie live on the estate) or would they be run by tenants? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M. Porcius Cato Posted March 4, 2007 Report Share Posted March 4, 2007 I recall reading that there were rich and large farms in Africa, where the farms were often fortified against indigenous raiders. The size of the farms strongly suggest that they employed slave labor, but one should recall that even rich farmers often worked in the fields beside their slaves (see, e.g., de Agricultura). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caldrail Posted March 5, 2007 Report Share Posted March 5, 2007 Rural slave labour was known to be cruel and backbreaking. I doubt the rich farmers worked as hard as the slaves did. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kosmo Posted March 5, 2007 Report Share Posted March 5, 2007 Latifundia, usually signaled by rural villa's were found thruout the empire, to a lesser extent in the border areas. After all, the roman empire was an aristocratic empire. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.