Klingan Posted February 9, 2007 Report Share Posted February 9, 2007 I've been thinking about how the weather conditions were in the roman empire, over the time. Considering that Sicily, and northern Africa were large exporters of grain, it would seems that it was generally colder. However I've never seen or heard about any fact on the subject, so I was wondering if anyone here could fill me in? Information about any Roman timeframe (until 476 AD) would be appreciated. Thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
votadini Posted February 9, 2007 Report Share Posted February 9, 2007 I've been thinking about how the weather conditions were in the roman empire, over the time. Considering that Sicily, and northern Africa were large exporters of grain, it would seems that it was generally colder. However I've never seen or heard about any fact on the subject, so I was wondering if anyone here could fill me in? Just 'thinking' off the top of my head, Egypt was a famous exporter of grain due to the fertility of the banks of the Nile, and Sicily was probably more forested in those days and thus the soil was more firmly secured to the earth. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klingan Posted February 9, 2007 Author Report Share Posted February 9, 2007 I've been thinking about how the weather conditions were in the roman empire, over the time. Considering that Sicily, and northern Africa were large exporters of grain, it would seems that it was generally colder. However I've never seen or heard about any fact on the subject, so I was wondering if anyone here could fill me in? Just 'thinking' off the top of my head, Egypt was a famous exporter of grain due to the fertility of the banks of the Nile, and Sicily was probably more forested in those days and thus the soil was more firmly secured to the earth. Yeah the Nile would explain Egypt but I reckon that they were growing grain at many more places then just Egypt in Africa? Good point about Sicily wasn't thinking about that. Deforestation have surly had it's share in it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
votadini Posted February 9, 2007 Report Share Posted February 9, 2007 Good point about Sicily wasn't thinking about that. Deforestation have surly had it's share in it. But don't quote me on that, just brainstorming . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klingan Posted February 9, 2007 Author Report Share Posted February 9, 2007 (edited) But don't quote me on that, just brainstorming . No worry, I'm just interested in it Not going to use this in any essay or something. Edited February 9, 2007 by Klingan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M. Porcius Cato Posted February 10, 2007 Report Share Posted February 10, 2007 I've been thinking about how the weather conditions were in the roman empire, over the time. Considering that Sicily, and northern Africa were large exporters of grain, it would seems that it was generally colder. Not colder--wetter. The ruins of Roman farms can now be found in areas too dry for cultivation, and there is additional evidence of considerable Roman floodwater farming in the Libyan pre-desert. This issue was studied by UNESCO for several years in an effort by modern Libya to revive the farming productivity enjoyed by the Romans. For a good paper on the topic, see Graeme Barker, "A Tale of Two Deserts: Contrasting Desertification Histories on Rome's Desert Frontiers", World Archaeology, Vol. 33, No. 3, Ancient Ecodisasters. (Feb., 2002), pp. 488-50. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aurelius Posted February 10, 2007 Report Share Posted February 10, 2007 I agree with Cato. The weather in North Africa. north of the 15 degree parallel was much more humid in the ancient past than it is today. I've read something about this matter in Heather's 'The Fall of the Roman Empire', especially concerning the agricultural productivity of the Maghreb region in North Africa due to the nature of its climate. Though I can't quite remember what was exactly said in the book, i'll have to try and trace it up. I'll also look on Cato's suggested paper, it sounds interesting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maladict Posted February 10, 2007 Report Share Posted February 10, 2007 During the late empire it would generally be colder than it is today. The Danube, for example, would frequently freeze in winter. Perhaps it would be a reason for the adoption of 'barbarian clothes'? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caldrail Posted February 14, 2007 Report Share Posted February 14, 2007 The north african climate was definitely wetter than today, and considering that the area was the most urbanised part of the empire it must have had a viable agriculture to support the population. Over-grazing since then hasn't helped, and the point raised about deforesation may be relevant. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaius Octavius Posted February 14, 2007 Report Share Posted February 14, 2007 During the late empire it would generally be colder than it is today.The Danube, for example, would frequently freeze in winter. Perhaps it would be a reason for the adoption of 'barbarian clothes'? The far reaches of my memory tell me that at the time of the Emperor Julian, 'icebergs' (not the Titanic kind) were seen in the Seine River. (?) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
votadini Posted February 14, 2007 Report Share Posted February 14, 2007 The far reaches of my memory tell me that at the time of the Emperor Julian, 'icebergs' (not the Titanic kind) were seen in the Seine River. (?) Even as late as the 18th Century there were still markets and festivities taking place on the frozen Thames in London (the end of what I believe they call the last Mini-Ice Age). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caldrail Posted February 15, 2007 Report Share Posted February 15, 2007 We tend to forget that our climate changes constantly. We live in a dynamic enviroment. Usually these changes are small but occaisionally, either because of geographic or astronomical phenomena, the climate can change radically for a short period. My favourite example comes from the 6th century Ireland, where the evidence from tree rings and other sources shows that during the dark ages the winter never let up for four years solid. Thats pretty tough on your survival chances believe me. I did read somewhere (sadly I no longer have the book) that an eruption of krakatoa during the late empire or early dark age had far reaching effects this side of the world. For those interested, krakatoa is indeed growing again and will no doubt erupt explosively at some point. Volcanoes and sea water are temptestuous partners. Just ask the minoans. The santorini explosion killed their civilisation in one fell swoop. The earth wobbles too. This wobbling was the cause of the original ice ages when it affected the flow of warm water northward. That could happen again very easily. In fact, this talk of global warming is a little incorrect. Britain is heading back toward the african-style climate it once had between ice ages anyway, all we've done is hurry the process a little. Get the picture? In fact, we're still recovering from the ice ages even today. Britain is rising out of the sea after the weight of ice a mile and a half thick thawed away. Its also tipping over. The northwest is rising, the souteast falling. Evidence shows human habitation at the bottom of the Solent after the ice ages. There's a castle in wales whose sea gate is well distant from the shore today. When we read of icebergs on the seine or of severe winters, make sure this isn't an isolated period rather than part of an overall trend. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaius Octavius Posted February 15, 2007 Report Share Posted February 15, 2007 There is a stripe of desert from Mauritania to Mongolia which has been expanding since Roman times. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.