Lost_Warrior Posted November 3, 2006 Report Share Posted November 3, 2006 (edited) I found this snippet in a book about witchcraft (NOT known for being great sources of historical truth, those books are). It stood out to me as being "something not right" although I don't actually know the correct course of events. (Besides that, the author has already made blatant factual mistakes elsewhere in the book.) From Advanced Witchcraft by Edain McCoy: Some Moors tried to adopt the Eastern Orthodox faith as codified by the Emporer Constantine (274-337) who, though raised as a Roman Pagan who worshipped Sol, eventually converted to Christianity and, from his seat of power in what is now modern-day Turkey, split the church in two pieces: the Eastern Orthodox, of which constantine was the supreme ruler, and Catholicism, which adhered to the edicts of the pope in Rome. My thoughts are, that the church was not split at this point. I had no idea that, at the time of the "first Christian emporer" there was ever even a Pope in Rome. I had been under the assumption that when Constantine converted to Christianity, all he did was encourage (or not) Christianity in Rome and end most of the persecution against Christians. [edited to add] I had thought that this should be in the Empire folder because it is about Constantine but on second glance, maybe it would be better in the Religion folder. If so, would someone kindly move it? Thanks Edited November 3, 2006 by Lost_Warrior Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DecimusCaesar Posted November 3, 2006 Report Share Posted November 3, 2006 You are right. Constantine didn't fully convert to Christianity until he was on his deathbed, he still had pagan sympathies throughout his reign. There could not have been a splitting of the Churches during Constantine's lifetime as Christianity didn't even become the official religion of the Empire until 394, under Theodosius the Great. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lost_Warrior Posted November 3, 2006 Author Report Share Posted November 3, 2006 I thought so. As my mom put it, Constantine fully converted only to "cover all his bases" for the afterlife Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aurelianus Posted November 3, 2006 Report Share Posted November 3, 2006 There were splits in the early church, such as Arianism, but catholisism came much later after the west had fallen. The Pope did exist, but he was just called the bishop, and later patriach of Rome (the city) the 'barbarians' called him Pope and denying the authority of the patriachs of Constantinople, Jerusalem, Alexandria and I think Ephesus or maybe Antioch. DC is right, Constantine only converted on his deathbed, and he certainly favored the christians. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ursus Posted November 4, 2006 Report Share Posted November 4, 2006 The church didn't fully split until 1054. My advice is not to trust any "historical" assertion found in books that have those little crescent moons on them symbolic of Wicca. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lost_Warrior Posted November 4, 2006 Author Report Share Posted November 4, 2006 Actually those little crescent moons are the symbol of the publisher, Lewellyn, a company rather notorious for the questionable content of its books. There are a few good witchcraft books out there that seem to have a good grasp on history, but as usual, they are no where to be found Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caldrail Posted November 5, 2006 Report Share Posted November 5, 2006 I thought so. As my mom put it, Constantine fully converted only to "cover all his bases" for the afterlife There was also the matter of unifying the empire after the civil war, which was close to ruin. At that time christianity was nothing more than a collection of individual churches and cults (much the same as islam declares itself to be today, and there are some similarities in organiational terms). Many of them were there to exploit their parishioners - there are tales of very wealthy christian leaders. However, christianity was becoming more popular and since it espoused a single god, Constantine decided he would use christianity as a method of tying the empire together again under one religion, hence the Council of Nicaea. Actually he failed in that respect because christianity remained prone to heretical cults, but it helped. It should also be remembered that Constantine tried to get one of his relatives worshipped as Jesus. As for that vision of a cross before the battle - Sorry, Constantine, you weren't exactly being honest were you? Constantine was outrageous. He really was. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ursus Posted November 5, 2006 Report Share Posted November 5, 2006 Religion aside though, I have to say I admire Constantine. He had the vision and the strength to take the empire to new directions. Granted those of us from the old school disagree about the direction it took, but nonetheless he was a most capable individual. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.