Ludovicus Posted July 30, 2006 Report Share Posted July 30, 2006 But did the Roman Empire really "fall" ? Isn't this an outdated way of looking at the Roman world? It certainly carried on in the East for a long time. Granted that living standards in the West declined rapidly beginning at least by the 6th century. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Northern Neil Posted July 30, 2006 Report Share Posted July 30, 2006 But did the Roman Empire really "fall" ? Isn't this an outdated way of looking at the Roman world? It certainly carried on in the East for a long time. Granted that living standards in the West declined rapidly beginning at least by the 6th century. Good point - the 'fall' versus ' evolution' debate rumbles on through various parts of the forum. I go for the view that the Roman world carried on for about another two centuries after the fall, complete with 'proper' Romans. After about 650 I think it was evolving into something else - although the Byzantine Empire was definitely still the same state as that founded at the start of the Republic, and continued to be until 1453. If you go for the view that the senate and church merged to form the current Roman Catholic Church, then it continues to this day - not my view, but one worth looking at. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Barkly Posted August 4, 2006 Report Share Posted August 4, 2006 I fail to see how Public Baths helped in the decline of the Roman Empire Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pertinax Posted August 4, 2006 Report Share Posted August 4, 2006 I fail to see how Public Baths helped in the decline of the Roman Empire I think the suggestion would be in keeping with the sensational and lascivious acts mentioned in the link here: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/arti...in_page_id=1787 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WotWotius Posted August 4, 2006 Report Share Posted August 4, 2006 I fail to see how Public Baths helped in the decline of the Roman Empire Baths and arcades corrupt and soften both the mind and the soul... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaius Octavius Posted August 4, 2006 Report Share Posted August 4, 2006 Baths & sex; booze & sex; culture & sex! War & Sex! Ah those Romans had it all right! Elementary, my dear WotWotius! Some historian felt that one of the contributing factors for the Fall was the deforestation of Italy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miguel Posted August 25, 2006 Report Share Posted August 25, 2006 I fail to see how Public Baths helped in the decline of the Roman Empire Perhaps it gets people taking too much pleasure in it and they fail to resist the enemies together when under attack. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Julian Posted August 27, 2006 Report Share Posted August 27, 2006 (edited) You know that list is all well and good, but I humbly pose the question; did Rome fall at all? Considering the influence the Vatican still has upon humanity, I think the question valid. Edited August 27, 2006 by Julian Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antiochus of Seleucia Posted August 28, 2006 Report Share Posted August 28, 2006 In my opinion the Roman Empire fell after Constantinople was captured but considering there still are "Roman Catholics" I also feel a psuedo-Roman empire still exists (as in the influence is still very present). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miguel Posted August 28, 2006 Report Share Posted August 28, 2006 In my opinion the Roman Empire fell after Constantinople was captured but considering there still are "Roman Catholics" I also feel a psuedo-Roman empire still exists (as in the influence is still very present). I agree with that as Roman culture really influences the world very deeply, which can be shown in many aspect like politics, economy and cultural development. (Examples: Latin transformed to European languages like Italian, French and Spanish; Greco-Roman style buildings and art works construct in the Renaissance or even nowadays.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spartan156 Posted September 16, 2006 Report Share Posted September 16, 2006 In my opinion the Roman Empire fell after Constantinople was captured but considering there still are "Roman Catholics" I also feel a psuedo-Roman empire still exists (as in the influence is still very present). I would have to disagree unless you have some info i havent seen, becauze i never found out what happened to the byzantie empire after the fall of Constantinople. Did the turks go into Greece? History's records state that an invasion of Greece from asia minor would be a bad idea. (Ask Dionissus, he'll tell you) Did greece just go back into a united but seperate city-state system? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaius Octavius Posted September 16, 2006 Report Share Posted September 16, 2006 By the time that Constantinople fell, it was not much more than an enclave and a vassalage of the Turks. Much of the Balkans had already been conquered. The Moslem prophet commanded that Constantinople and Jerusalem be conquered. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.