Philhellene Posted April 16, 2006 Report Share Posted April 16, 2006 All official emperors except Julian were christian, but what about usurpers? Philostorgius calls Western Roman emperor-usurper Eugenius pagan (XI, 2). Are there other sources about his belief? Was Procopius, nephew of Julian, pagan? It seems that сynic Heraclius (he was old friend of Julian, that`s why I think he was pagan) was one of his pals (Eunapius apud Exc. De sent. Mai. P.267). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Primus Pilus Posted April 17, 2006 Report Share Posted April 17, 2006 Philostorgius calls Western Roman emperor-usurper Eugenius pagan (XI, 2). Are there other sources about his belief? Zosimus is fairly non descript but he describes God as being on the side of Theodosius. Thats not definitive though I suppose. Ambrose Epistle 57 to Eugenius certainly leaves the impression that the emperor has "heathen" leanings. Paulinus in his Life of Ambrose mentions that Eugenius was a nominal Christian and it seems that he used Pagans for political and military gain against Theodosius. As Arbogast was the chief power in the western empire and all accounts suggest he was Pagan, it seems pretty safe that there was a concerted effort to restore some semblence of pagan idealism. I certainly don't think its Theodosian propoganda at any rate. I think that Philostorgius was an Arian and Theodosian was certainly anti-Arian so Philostorgius (even though both were Christian) would have little reason to favor one over another Christian. But he could favor a Nicene Christian (which was anti-arian) over a pagan. In theory that is Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.