Jump to content
UNRV Ancient Roman Empire Forums

Barbarians


Kathleenb

Recommended Posts

The concept of "barbarians" went from non-Greek speaking to non-Latin speaking to non-Roman culture as well, and it probably carried with it some negative connotations. I think Romans tended to evaluate others not just on their language (although written language that was very important and worthy of respect by the Romans), but also in terms of their material culture, their social structure, their law, and their military prowess.

 

I am looking for ancient sources which spoke negatively of the "barbarians," either explicitly or just showing negative underlying assumptions/connotations. I thought these would be easy to find, but there are fewer (and they are buried deeper) than I thought.

 

Anyone willing to point me at specific texts?

 

Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ammianus Marcellinus, XXI, 10, 8; 12, 25.

 

Ammianus blames Julian for Nevitta who was appointed co-consul of Mamertinus, because Nevitta was a barbarian.

 

 

Thanks!

 

Livy certainly has a lot to say, negative, about the barbarians.

hot-headed, ruled by emotion not intellect 5.36, 5.37, 5.49, 27.17, 27.19, 27.29

 

Lack of culture 5.48, 28.18, 34.24

 

Lack of material culture 21.60,

 

undisciplined and disorganized 24.48, 28.1, 30.28, 31.34

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Procopius desribing the Emperor justinian

"In the first place, Justinian having no natural aptitude towards the imperial dignity, neither assumed the royal manner nor thought it necessary to his prestige. In his accent, in his dress and in his ideas he was a barbarian. When he wished to issue a decree, he did not give it out through the Quaestor's office, as is usual, but most frequently preferred to announce it himself, in spite of his barbarous accent....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Procopius desribing the Emperor justinian

"In the first place, Justinian having no natural aptitude towards the imperial dignity, neither assumed the royal manner nor thought it necessary to his prestige. In his accent, in his dress and in his ideas he was a barbarian. When he wished to issue a decree, he did not give it out through the Quaestor's office, as is usual, but most frequently preferred to announce it himself, in spite of his barbarous accent....

 

Are you sure that wasn't Justin, Justinian's father?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Don't think so I think it was Justinian but willcheck when I find the book. it was quite a way intothe book and he only described Justin and his manners etc at the begining. Anyway the mainthing is that it gives anidea of theway barbarians were viewed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

A while back I wrote an essay on Greco-Roman attitudes towards the Iron age Britons, and the validity of the contemporary sources surrounding them (you may recognize it from a previous post).

 

And here it is...

 

How useful are the Greco-Roman sources in determining the truth about life and events in Iron Age Britain?

 

History is by no means set in stone. Though we can piece together much of the past

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...