Emperor Goblinus Posted December 9, 2005 Report Share Posted December 9, 2005 From it's beginning to 476 A.D., which of its many civil wars do you think was the worst? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sextus Roscius Posted December 9, 2005 Report Share Posted December 9, 2005 Personal, I'd have to say either the Civil war after Caesar's death or the one after Caligula's. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Primus Pilus Posted December 9, 2005 Report Share Posted December 9, 2005 Especially considering some of the recent discussions we've had, its very difficult to argue with Caesar's civil war as not being the most significant event and could easily be considered the 'worst' depending on perspective. However, I'd like some clarification on what you are asking. Do you mean worst as in number of casualties, impact on society, impact on politics, or a combined overall effect? or the one after Caligula's. Just as a note, I believe you are actually referring to the war after Nero's reign since Claudius assumed power under military influence but not as a result of war. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sextus Roscius Posted December 9, 2005 Report Share Posted December 9, 2005 Oh, thank you for the correction P.P. My mind was else where when I wrote. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emperor Goblinus Posted December 9, 2005 Author Report Share Posted December 9, 2005 Especially considering some of the recent discussions we've had, its very difficult to argue with Caesar's civil war as not being the most significant event and could easily be considered the 'worst' depending on perspective. or the one after Caligula's. Probably in terms of sheer devastation and scope. I for one think that the one in the Year of the Four Emperors was the worst. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ursus Posted December 9, 2005 Report Share Posted December 9, 2005 The Crisis of the Third Century, taken as a whole. The loss of faith in imperial unity as an aftermath started a devolution toward more local oriented economies and cultures. The foundations of the infernal Middle Ages were already being laid by the time the Germanic hordes finally severed the political unity of the West. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WotWotius Posted December 9, 2005 Report Share Posted December 9, 2005 Does Sparticus' revolt count as a civil war? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emperor Goblinus Posted December 10, 2005 Author Report Share Posted December 10, 2005 To a certain extent, I would say so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Germanicus Posted December 10, 2005 Report Share Posted December 10, 2005 It depends on your definition of "worst". In terms of the soldiery, probably Caesars civil war was devastating, but in terms of the populace, from my reading of that civil war I don't see as big an impact as in 69AD. From what I'm reading at the moment, various armies in the field effectively had no strong leadership, and raped and pilliaged mercilessly, within Italy particularly. Agricolas mother was mudered by Legionaries in one such massacre. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M. Porcius Cato Posted December 11, 2005 Report Share Posted December 11, 2005 Probably the most devastating and most consequential of the civil wars was wrought by the wrath of Octavian and Antony, following the tyrannicide of Caesar. His avengers shared absolutely none of Caesar's (much exaggerated) clemency. See especially Tacitus on the effects of their proscriptions and a chilling aside in Propertius on Octavian's suppression of the Perugian revolt. Even Livia, Suetonius tells us, did not weep when killing Augustus because she remembered the blood-lust of the young Octavian. These Civil Wars essentially wiped out the last defenders of the Old Republic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Virgil61 Posted December 12, 2005 Report Share Posted December 12, 2005 The Crisis of the Third Century, taken as a whole. The loss of faith in imperial unity as an aftermath started a devolution toward more local oriented economies and cultures. The foundations of the infernal Middle Ages were already being laid by the time the Germanic hordes finally severed the political unity of the West. I second this. In so many ways--militarily, culturally and politically--the empire that came out of the Crisis seems at some levels fundamentally different from what came before it. It is a major turning point in Roman history. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hamilcar Barca Posted December 12, 2005 Report Share Posted December 12, 2005 (edited) Rome had so many horrible civil wars that I often loose count of them and have trouble difficulty determining which single one could be considered the 'worst'. It depends what exactly you mean by 'worst'. i.e. loss of life, long term repercusions, political turmoil etc. As has already been stated, the collective military coups and civil wars of the 3rd century probably top all such categories but as to label a single 'contained' conflict, I'd have to say that the Caesarians vs Republicans (49BC - 36BC), was the bloodiest. While in reality a series of wars, the same underlying themes and causes was carried on until Pompey's youngest son - Sextus Pompeius, laid down his arms after the battle of Naucholus in 36BC. Constantines wars against Maxentius and Lucullus (311 - 326) also involved vast amonts of bloodshed. Edited December 12, 2005 by Hamilcar Barca Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.