Jump to content
UNRV Ancient Roman Empire Forums

Worst General Or Politician In Roman History


Sextus Roscius

Recommended Posts

I felt like creating this topic after reading another one which is the reverse of this topic. I wanted to figure out who was the worst general in Roman history and what other people thought about the subject. I thought this would be a better result than the normal questions asking about who the best was.

 

Anyways, in my opinion the worst general of the Romans was (out of the major ones) Hardian, becuase he ultimately signed Romes death wish be sealing off the frontiers. The constantly expanding frontier was vital becuase new conquests provided slaves and wealth for the empire which we needed to keep things being built and to maintain the mass infastructure of the Roman Empire.

 

Though I do see why he sealed off the frontiers, I think he sorta took the sore losers way out by saying "well, I give up, fine, we'll just stay right here!" instead of saying "Oh ya, well your mom is smelly too! Come over here and say that to my face! Thats it I'm a coming over" I know this isn't at all acurate but I sorta think that is how the Empire started being once Hadrian sealed off the Frontiers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Nero was probably the worst politician and leader, what in the right mind would make you burn down Rome, if you want a prominent person to pick without doubt.Worst general would be Emperor Valens, I mean, how do you lose to the Goths who had inaquedate resources and horrible maneuring and who managed to attack the sides of the Romans with their lame calvary, then draw the Romans in and then fully flank them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Hadrian just re instituted an Augustan Policy. But was overall a good General. He instituted huge training programs, the troops loved him, he trained with them in person, rewarded those who deserved it, enforced strict discipline and the army was not in decline under him, or his successors (Pius/Aurelius).

 

Worst General - Varus or Crassus (don't know a lot about the later or eastern empire so can't comment).

 

Worst Politician - Depends on your definition of worst. I would say Cato for singlehandedly caused the final collapse of the republic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These two certainly need to be mentioned among the worst generals: Mallius Maximus and Quintus Servilius Caepio at the battle of Aurasio in 105 BC.

 

Worst politician: When one truly thinks about it, wouldn't the worst politician truly be the one that absolutely nobody has ever heard of. The very nature of the politician is to use ones popularity as a tool. B) However, I'll throw the ineffective optimate, Bibulus, out there as a man whose every political move was thwarted by the genius of Caesar. Romans remembered years according to who the elected consuls were and because of the bumbling of Bibulus as Caesar's co-consul in 59 BC, that year was jokingly referred to as the year

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Varus for throwing away the "best of armies". Commodus brought many years of proficient stability to a chaotic ending by staying at home and partying.

May I as a small aside mention the book "on the psychology of Military Incompetence" -Dixon: mostly modern era but useful reading for students of war and generalship.If you work in any large organisation of any type its worth reading to identify your Boss and his weird behaviour traits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know this is semantical in nature, but I have a hard time accepting a hereditary emperor as the worst politician. I mean, they were thrust into that role in many cases with no regard for ability or inclination. I suppose that in my mind the definition of politician requires a less 'imperial' state of government... but that's just me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know this is semantical in nature, but I have a hard time accepting a hereditary emperor as the worst politician. I mean, they were thrust into that role in many cases with no regard for ability or inclination. I suppose that in my mind the definition of politician requires a less 'imperial' state of government... but that's just me.

 

You could take that viewpoint, but then you would have to also say that incredible administrators like Augustus, Vespasian, or Diocletian were also not politicians. To say such a thing for me would be a robbery of the qualities of these heroes! :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You could take that viewpoint, but then you would have to also say that incredible administrators like Augustus, Vespasian, or Diocletian were also not politicians. To say such a thing for me would be a robbery of the qualities of these heroes! :)

 

Indeed, but notice that my choices for best and worst politicians in these threads are both pre-imperial. Agree or disagree, I maintained consistency :D

 

(not that I'm implying that others aren't consistent)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...