Jump to content
UNRV Ancient Roman Empire Forums

3-year-old Israeli girl finds Canaanite scarab


guy

Recommended Posts

IMG_6154.gif.5987cce90e7077de2874f7841516a568.gif
 

A 3-year-old Israeli girl has discovered an ancient Canaanite scarab while hiking with her family. (Scarabs are amulets and impression seals (shaped like scarab beetles) and were popular throughout ancient Egypt.)


The scarab is 3,800 years old and was found in Tel Azeka, which is mentioned in the Bible as the site of the battle between David and the Philistine giant, Goliath.


IMG_6153.jpeg.2561d43e560a8dbe0157592fede753b6.jpeg

 

https://www.timesofisrael.com/three-year-old-girl-finds-canaanite-seal-where-bible-says-david-battled-goliath/

Edited by guy
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/1/2025 at 7:44 PM, indianasmith said:

Amazing things are found in that ancient land almost every day.

...which means for us to find them so frequently, they must have been amazingly careless with their possessions. Surely only a small fraction of those items would survive to be found thousands of yrs later.....Maybe they lost so much because they hadn't yet invented the pocket for their togas?

We often blame the dryer for losing all those socks....Have we considered that maybe it was really the washer's fault?

I'm currently trying to invent a plastic detector so archeologists of the distant future will have a chance to find our lost artifacts.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, guidoLaMoto said:

for us to find them so frequently, they must have been amazingly careless with their possessions.

Downhill from an active archeo dig, with rare flood events; it seems like a natural concentrator. Reminds me of the ancient skeletons found in Kenya which were taken as proof of mankind's origin there. Actually it was no more likely to be an origin point than anywhere else within 1000 miles; it was just a natural preservation zone with deposition and periodic erosion. Now DNA evidence gives some nuance.

Edited by caesar novus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Probabilities are still the major factor involved in finding artifacts- from the effect of any object's  durability to survive the years to the numbers of any particular object that existed....Future archeologists will find more Chevies than Ferraris and more Ferraris than Tiffany chandeliers....Biological specimens present particular problems. To become fossilized, the object must be buried rapidly to be separated from oxygen-- but the chances of eventually finding one still depends on the original population numbers- common species are found more often than uncommon ones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...