sonic Posted July 16, 2021 Report Share Posted July 16, 2021 To some degree I disagree: I don't think Justinian had an overarching plan to reconquer the West. His reconquest of Africa from the Vandals was born out of chance, and it was this that was the spark for the further attempts at conquest. I do agree that luck was against him, but only after the defeat of the Vandals. That was the greatest slice of luck in his - or possibly any Roman emperor's reign. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caldrail Posted July 16, 2021 Report Share Posted July 16, 2021 The impression I get is that Justinian saw reconquest as a duty, both as a 'Roman' and as a Christian. He was a reformer, a man who made sweeping cuts to the administration of the empire removing many elite men, clearly unafraid of the reactions others would exhibit in response to his directives. Indeed, his reign saw the old senatorial order replaced by a three tier system of status that required service to progress. None of this was luck - just hard headed decisiveness. Such a man would not rely on luck to re-establish the old Roman world surely? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sonic Posted July 17, 2021 Report Share Posted July 17, 2021 I agree with most of what you are saying. I don't think he relied on luck. I think the Vandal kingdom losing its way at that specific time and having Belisarius at hand was lucky. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.