sonic Posted July 24, 2012 Report Share Posted July 24, 2012 A couple of years ago I asked members for suggestions regarding what biographies they would like to see written. Many thanks for your ideas! Reading recent reviews I've noticed the slow emergence of a recurring phrase, something along the lines of: 'This book does little to add to our knowledge of a man who is already covered extensively in the literature'. With this in mind, what is the view of members? Is there any historical person where, if a new 'biography' was available, you'd just ignore it completely? I must admit I'm half-expecting the response to be 'Hannibal', but maybe I am just being pessimistic! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ursus Posted July 24, 2012 Report Share Posted July 24, 2012 With this in mind, what is the view of members? Is there any historical person where, if a new 'biography' was available, you'd just ignore it completely? Caesar and Augustus come immediately to mind. Actually, if there is a decent biography of someone - anyone - written in the last 20 years or so, and the proposed new biography adds little to what is already known, I'm not sure what it would bring to the table. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M. Porcius Cato Posted July 25, 2012 Report Share Posted July 25, 2012 Helen of Troy. One bio is enough. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melvadius Posted July 26, 2012 Report Share Posted July 26, 2012 I'm not a great one for biographies anyway but I'd probably run a mile from any more iterations of Boudicca's 'life' that were much longer than the two sections in Tacitus. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sonic Posted June 4, 2013 Author Report Share Posted June 4, 2013 I've noticed that since I started this topic there are even more books on Constantine being published. I'm even thinking of doing one myself at some point! I'm just not sure what angle to take. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DecimusCaesar Posted June 4, 2013 Report Share Posted June 4, 2013 There seems to be quite few big biographies about Spartacus on the market ( I don't count works of fiction here, they are alright). Which is astonishing when we know very little about the man. Wasn't it Mary Beard who stated that the bigger the book on Spartacus, the less likely it is to be truthful? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Virgil61 Posted June 14, 2013 Report Share Posted June 14, 2013 (edited) Cleopatra seems to be the focus of some recent biographies. Frankly I can't be bothered. Even when a favorite author like Adrian Goldsworthy puts out a bio I won't read it. Edited June 14, 2013 by Virgil61 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maty Posted June 20, 2013 Report Share Posted June 20, 2013 Actually the Goldsworthy book has a lot to recommend it. It concentrates of dispelling some of the myths surrounding Antony and Cleopatra - for example I was rather surprised to note that an analysis of Antony's early career shows that he did not actually have much military experience before he became a triumvir. Cleopatra as a feminist 'African' icon does not do well under his scrutiny either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GhostOfClayton Posted June 21, 2013 Report Share Posted June 21, 2013 Cleopatra as a feminist 'African' icon does not do well under his scrutiny either. You mean because of all the drugs and the throwing herself at anything in a toga, right? And that she probably considered herself more Greek than African? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thurinius Posted July 20, 2014 Report Share Posted July 20, 2014 Cleopatra as a feminist 'African' icon does not do well under his scrutiny either. You mean because of all the drugs and the throwing herself at anything in a toga, right? And that she probably considered herself more Greek than African? Oh come on, two Romans who made a useful alliance for Egypt. Can we now talk about that 'slut' Caesar and him throwing himself at anyone with a pair if breasts. On topic, nothing more on Caligula please. He was mad. He wasn't mad just testing the limits of absolute power. He was mad and we know what with (diagnosis from some scant passages written two millennia ago) He wasn't mad but one can understand him having some scores to settle 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aurelia Posted July 22, 2014 Report Share Posted July 22, 2014 No more Alexander the Great biographies, please! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Artimi Posted July 25, 2014 Report Share Posted July 25, 2014 no more mad debauched Romans.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sonic Posted July 25, 2014 Author Report Share Posted July 25, 2014 No Alexander and no Nero?? But what else is there?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thurinius Posted July 25, 2014 Report Share Posted July 25, 2014 No more Alexander the Great biographies, please! Yep count me in on that one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sonic Posted July 26, 2014 Author Report Share Posted July 26, 2014 OK, but what if an author you trusted and had written books you liked came up with a new biography on Alexander? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.