Jump to content
UNRV Ancient Roman Empire Forums

Caligula Statue : How Accurate?


guy

Recommended Posts

I recently got this image of Caligula from Wikipedia (source of all information--some good and too frequently bad).

 

What's the opinion of this image of Caligula? How accurate, especially with the fair hair and eye coloring?

 

Caligula was not part of the Ahenobarbus [or "red-beard" (literally, "bronze-beard") in Latin] plebeian family of the Domitia gens as was Nero. (Source : Wikipedia)

 

post-3665-0-47827500-1341116908_thumb.png

 

Other than this background information, there was no other information:

 

A marble bust of Caligula restored to its original colours. The colours were identified from particles trapped in the marble.

 

Istanbul Archaeological Museum, room 5 - Reconstruction of the original polychromy of a Roman portrait of emperor Caligula (37-41 a.D.). On a loan by the Glyptotek in Munich for the Bunte G

post-3665-0-28148300-1341117759_thumb.png

post-3665-0-98187600-1341156496_thumb.png

post-3665-0-82915400-1341161651_thumb.png

Edited by guy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The team in Munich has done a lot of research on the theme and, although I've never been to the Glyptothek yet, I think we can say it's about as close to the real thing as the current science allows us to go. It does match in style with other julio-claudian statues' reconstruction (think of the Augustus Prima Porta shown in, amongst other, the Vatican Museum and the Ashmolean of Oxford).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's always going to be a bit speculative though, isn't it? If the image was derived from bones as experts seem extraordinarily capable of, I would accept it, but statues are not actually facsimiles in the Roman world but rather icons of a personality cult, sometimes idealised, sometimes simply symbolic and woefully inaccutrate if recognisable as a 'brand'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if the statue itself appears exactly as it did 2000 years ago, what's to say the person who painted it had ever laid eyes on the lad himself? I would guess he had a not-too-dark brown hair colour, and the painter just used what he had available that most approximated it. That said, the skin tone is pretty realistic for a limited colour pallette.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would guess he had a not-too-dark brown hair colour, and the painter just used what he had available that most approximated it. That said, the skin tone is pretty realistic for a limited colour pallette.

 

Maybe Malcolm McDowell was the correct actor to play Caligula afterall.

 

post-3665-0-94029300-1341416228_thumb.png

 

guy also known as gaius

Edited by guy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...