Virgil61 Posted May 23, 2011 Report Share Posted May 23, 2011 Opinions on the status of Theodore Mommsen, Hans Delbr Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Centurion-Macro Posted May 23, 2011 Report Share Posted May 23, 2011 Reading any historian is of benefit. If we still read people like Plutarch and Herodotus, I fail to see why these men should be any different. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Virgil61 Posted May 23, 2011 Author Report Share Posted May 23, 2011 Reading any historian is of benefit. If we still read people like Plutarch and Herodotus, I fail to see why these men should be any different. There's the obvious answer that the difference is Plutarch and Herodotus become primary sources in their own right. Not only their subject matter but they become the object of study and a mirror into the thinking of the classical world. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Viggen Posted May 23, 2011 Report Share Posted May 23, 2011 ..i would like to add to the discussion a work from forum member Wotwotius on some of the mentioned writers http://www.unrv.com/academia/intrusive-ideology.php cheers viggen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klingan Posted May 23, 2011 Report Share Posted May 23, 2011 Well, they are always going to be useful for our understanding of how we know (read: come to think we know) what we know. There are a lot of ideas floating around that were actually just made up back then that we simply take for facts now and use as a basis for further interpretations. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ursus Posted May 23, 2011 Report Share Posted May 23, 2011 I've never actually read a history book on Rome that is older than 30-40 years (aside from the primary sources). I think Scullard would be the oldest. Am I missing anything? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Virgil61 Posted May 23, 2011 Author Report Share Posted May 23, 2011 (edited) dbl post... Edited May 23, 2011 by Virgil61 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Virgil61 Posted May 23, 2011 Author Report Share Posted May 23, 2011 (edited) I've never actually read a history book on Rome that is older than 30-40 years (aside from the primary sources). I think Scullard would be the oldest. Am I missing anything? I think we should all read Gibbon in his entirety [i myself have not, only sections here and there]. If only because he's so influential. Well, they are always going to be useful for our understanding of how we know (read: come to think we know) what we know. There are a lot of ideas floating around that were actually just made up back then that we simply take for facts now and use as a basis for further interpretations. We're always on the lookout for something new and fresh what with the pressures of academia and publications. Edited May 23, 2011 by Virgil61 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Virgil61 Posted May 23, 2011 Author Report Share Posted May 23, 2011 ..i would like to add to the discussion a work from forum member Wotwotius on some of the mentioned writers http://www.unrv.com/academia/intrusive-ideology.php cheers viggen Wonderful stuff. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sonic Posted May 24, 2011 Report Share Posted May 24, 2011 (edited) Well, they are always going to be useful for our understanding of how we know (read: come to think we know) what we know. There are a lot of ideas floating around that were actually just made up back then that we simply take for facts now and use as a basis for further interpretations. I agree. Yet the fact that their opinions were accepted as the truth shows how influential they still are. Yet in my opinion the main reason to read them is because, on the whole, they had a far greater grasp on the original source material, both due to their training in Latin and Ancient Greek, and because they had more time in which to research and write their books. When doing research, I always consult the older books and religiously check their references (where given). This has resulted in the finding of little-known or forgotten snippets of information. I especially like Bury for this. Edited May 24, 2011 by sonic Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.