Zeke Posted March 24, 2005 Report Share Posted March 24, 2005 What limmited powers did the Senate have during Imperial Rome, In general........not any partciular time. Zeke Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Primus Pilus Posted March 24, 2005 Report Share Posted March 24, 2005 Of course, the 'power' of the Senate varied widely depending on the Emperor. In general terms though, the Senate largely served as a recruiting pool for all the various magistracies and government appointments. In the late Republican period magistrates were elected by the citizen assemblies, but in the imperial period this 'election' was given strictly to the Senate (Though imperial suggestion could quite obviously influence the vote) They still oversaw many functions of government, but the Emperor could intervene at any time. While the Senate still 'voted' on various legislation, it was usually quite apparent to them whether or not they really had any choice on how to vote. They also had the right to 'elect' a new Emperor, but this too was usually decided well in advance of their 'vote'. However, their vote did legitimize the rule. This only scratches the service, but the Senate did function in much the same capacity as they did in the Republic. They were just limited by the fact that they held no real authority and every decision could be overturned or influenced by the Emperor. An excellent... if somewhat expensive book on the subject. The Senate of Imperial Rome Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeke Posted March 25, 2005 Author Report Share Posted March 25, 2005 Thanks...anyone got anymore info? Zeke Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.