Trethiwr Posted December 28, 2010 Report Share Posted December 28, 2010 When a slave was freed didn't he take the name of his former master? But presumably not the entire name or the freedman would have the exact same name as his illustrious ex boss, and (if Hollywood had anything to do with it) he might accidentally become Consul! Also if a wealthy patrician freed a number of slaves they couldn't ALL have the same name, could they? So which bits did they keep and what got changed? Also slightly off topic does anyone know if Caius Julius Caesar (b.140 - d.85 BC had any slaves freed on his death. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ingsoc Posted December 28, 2010 Report Share Posted December 28, 2010 The slave receive his praenomen and nomen of his master while his original name became the cognomen. For example the famous historian Josephus' Roman name is Titus Flavius Iosephus as he was liberated and granted citizenship by the Flavii emperors. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trethiwr Posted December 28, 2010 Author Report Share Posted December 28, 2010 Aaaah, thank you. Of course. And well done for getting an answer about names before Nephele. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GhostOfClayton Posted December 28, 2010 Report Share Posted December 28, 2010 The other good example is Marcus Tullius Tiro. Freedman, and former slave of Marcus Tullius Cicero. It was fashionable for slaves to have a Greek-style name (in this case Tiro). Following his manumission, Tiro took on the 'Marcus Tullius' of Cicero. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.