okamido Posted May 22, 2010 Report Share Posted May 22, 2010 Was the Canaanite warlord Labayu, mentioned in the Amarna letters the historical Saul? In the letters to Pharoah Akhenaton, Biridiya of Meggido complains that Labayu was attacking his lands; Meggido being in the Jazreel valley that Saul fought in. Abdu-Heba sends a request to Akhenaton for archers to fight off the Habiru, which some scholars believe may have been the original Hebrews, although this is not yet proven or disproven. Abdu-Heba sends a second letter stating that Labayu is slain and that his sons are taking cities of the King and giving them to the Habiru, and that he fears for the loss of his own city, U-ru-sa-lim (Jerusalem). Is the son of Labayu, David, and is Labayu, Saul. Some other interesting similarities: -The Name Labayu translates as "Great Lion of (god)". -Saul is referred to as the "great lion of Yhwh". -Psalm 57 also makes mention of Saul's men/ personal guard as lebaim'(lions). -Saul's son Ish-bosheth and Labayu's Son Mutbaal; both names translate as "man of baal". -Mutbaal then identifies three men in a latter Amarna letter, Dadua, Ayab, and Yishaya. If Mutbaal is actually the son of Saul, then these three names could be reconciled with David, Joab, and Yishai. -Saul and Labayu were both killed at Gilboa. Just too many interesting similarities to be just "thrown out with the bath water." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.