aquilifer2k10 Posted December 28, 2009 Report Share Posted December 28, 2009 (edited) Britain being the exception, it seems rather difficult to find out the highest status of towns within the provinces of the Roman Empire. The Barrington Atlas, I've discovered, is a completely useless resource as it fails to attach a status to any settlement between village and town. BRITAIN Coloniae Colchester (Camulodunum) Gloucester (Glevem) Lincoln (Lindum) York (Eboracum) Municipia St Albans (Verulamium) Civitates Aldborough (Isurium Brigantium) Brough (Petuaria) Caerwent (Venta Silurum) Caistor-by-Norwich (Venta Icenorum) Canterbury (Durovernum Cantiacorum) Carmarthen (Moridunum Demetarum) Chelmsford (Trinovantum) Chichester (Noviomagus Reginorum) Cirencester (Corinium Dobunnorum) Dorchester (Durnovaria) Exeter (Isca Dumniorum) Leicester (Ratae Corieltauvorum) Silchester (Calleva Atrebatum) Winchester (Venta Belgarum) Wroxeter (Viroconium Cornoviorum) Unknown Status London (Londinium) Potential towns: Ilchester (Lindinis), Carlisle, Corbridge, Kenchester, Rochester, Water Newton, Richborough. Potential municipia/coloniae: Besides London, there are several other towns listed above that could have had higher status according to the author of Place Names Of Roman Britain. GERMANY (SUPERIOR AND INFERIOR) Coloniae or Municipia Augst (Augusta Raurica) Koln (Colonia Agrippinensis) Nijmegen (Ulpia Noviomagus) Rottweil (Arae Flaviae) Voorburg-Arentsburg (Forum Hadriani) Xanten (Colonia Ulpia Traiana) Civitates Baden-Baden (Aquae) Cannstatt Dieburg Heddernheim (Nida) Ladenburg (Lopodunum) Neuenstadt Oedenburg (Argentovana) Pforzheim (Portus) Riegel Rottenburg (Sumelocenna) Schleitheim (Luliomagus) Speyer (Noviomagus) Tongeren (Aduatuca Tungrorum) Wiesbaden (Aquae Mattiacorum) Wimpfen Worms (Borbetomagus) Unknown Status Bonn (Bonna) Mainz (Mogontiacum) Neuss (Novaesium) Zulpich (Tolbiacum) Waldgirmes Can anyone help with these last five or any potential corrections? GAUL Gaul is one of the hardest provinces to research towns, and I'm almost ready to give up, as no maps seem to state--even from recent issues of the Gallia journal--Coloniae or Municipia status for any towns. Everything is simply given Civitas status, when I know this doesn't apply to all Gallic towns. Even more bizarre is the classification of Boulogne as a town! I know it was a naval base, but what evidence is there that it became a town? http://www.nord-pas-de-calais.pref.gouv.fr...ra_boulogne.pdf Anyone read French? Does it mention anything about Boulogne being a town? Edited December 28, 2009 by aquilifer2k10 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Northern Neil Posted December 28, 2009 Report Share Posted December 28, 2009 Anyone read French? Does it mention anything about Boulogne being a town? Yes, and yes: L Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aquilifer2k10 Posted December 28, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 28, 2009 Thanks for your reply! Elsewhere, the article makes reference to 'The Ancient Town'. Although this settlement's function was a port, it was also at the same time a town - by neccesity even, as a civilian population would be essential to maintain the local economy. Right, but you know the difference between a town and civilian population that develops around the outside of a fort or base (vicus)? For Boulogne to have been a Roman Town, French historians/archaeologists must have found remains of a Forum-Basilica located somewhere in the vicinity or something from an inscription or the Latin place name, Gesoriacum/Bononia, indicating it was a civitas, municipium or colonia. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maladict Posted December 28, 2009 Report Share Posted December 28, 2009 (edited) Maybe this book will be of interest, previews are available for pages 50, 51 and 53, dealing with Boulogne and including a map. I haven't read this one, but I found his book on southern france a rather good survey. Edited December 28, 2009 by Maladict Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aquilifer2k10 Posted December 28, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 28, 2009 I got that book, but unfortunately it's rather vague when it talks about the later history of Boulogne, but is good as a guide book on what visible remains can be see today with good info on the local museums etc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sylla Posted December 29, 2009 Report Share Posted December 29, 2009 Being aware of its obvious limitations as a source, I think some valuable information on this issue may be obtained from the Italian version of Wikipedia. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.