NeoCicero Posted November 22, 2011 Report Share Posted November 22, 2011 (edited) Wikipeida doesn't seem to reflect this, so I wonder how much of the definition has changed over time, and how much has been lost. Edited March 6, 2012 by NeoCicero Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeoCicero Posted March 6, 2012 Report Share Posted March 6, 2012 Most of our available sources predominantly used this term to describe the sum of rights and interests of the Roman people, understood as a whole.That Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maty Posted March 6, 2012 Report Share Posted March 6, 2012 'Res' in Latin has the same multiplicity of meanings as 'thing', with the added meaning of 'stuff'. So 'in media res' means in the 'middle of things' and 'res militae' means 'military stuff'. So if you have a lot of stuff, you may well be wealthy, or just a hoarder. Both the Latin and the English need you to infer from the context here. The Republic was a 'public thing'; something owned by the people who made up the state. In fact it was so important that it was generally THE public thing, but as Latin does not use articles this has to be understood by inference. So we could call the British and American democracies 'public property', and Tacitus can remark that few people remembered when the state was public property, but even a dictatorship can stick the same label on roof tiles and manhole covers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.