Why would there be a source circulating around that denied something that was concocted by hearsay? In the past MPC, you have shunned the use of Suetonius on the grounds of his exaggerating nature. However, now that you have found a quote that quashes Augustus' reputation - and thus feeds your lifelong ambition - Suetonius is now apparently 100% fact. As I am sure was mentioned earlier, Suetonius is probably as reliable as a tabloid newspaper