"an army thrives on hard work" ( somebody remind me who said it please!) and weve talked about pilae in the thread previously, in particular lethality against non-dispersed targets ( sorry to do that backwards but Im trying to emphasise that the "ancient " battlefield was very compact versus machine age ), and counter shock to an aggressing assault formation even if lethality is not great.
The falxe was fearsome ,but again the same "target availability " factor comes into play.Does anyone have any sources on wound locality for Legion casualties, I recall some debate about the tendency of Romans to suffer slash wounds to legs, hands and exposed face areas ( ie: an opponent was obliged to stab at the face where possible , in a melee,because of the excellent protection of the various helmet types).
We know that like the Japanese (medieval) the Romans learnt fast from enemies and assimilated ideas rapidly.