Jump to content
UNRV Ancient Roman Empire Forums

G-Manicus

Equites
  • Posts

    615
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by G-Manicus

  1. I've got to say, the possibility of finding works previously thought lost to history is truly exciting.
  2. "WORLDS ARE COLLIDING, JERRY!" - George Costanza
  3. No, sir. I think hairstyle and the like are enough of a hint for now. I will say though that, like Cato, when it came to bribery he was not a fan.
  4. Even a blind pig finds an acorn once in awhile! (back in a bit with a pic)
  5. To quote Ocatavian though "GIVE ME BACK MY LEGIONS!" (It's Varus )
  6. Slim pickings these days ... (see initial posting for complete listings) Thursday 10/25/07 Rick Steves' Europe HDNET - 7:30 am Next showing: England's Bath and York Roman hot springs; cruising canals; Gothic church; Viking history. Monday 11/5/07 Ancient Sites Brought to Life Travel - 4:00 pm Computer graphics re-create the splendor of pyramids and temples. (throwing this one out there on a hunch that there's some Roman related stuff) Incredible Catacombs Travel - 6:00 pm Beneath the world's most famous cities, ancient civilizations lie frozen in time.
  7. Grrrrr ...! I'll refrain from anymore guesses for now and give someone else a shot (unless I find the answer that is )
  8. Given the complexity and lavishness of Emperor Qin's final resting place, I'll give them the benefit of the doubt that they actually built the Epang Palace.
  9. Decimus Junius Brutus Albinus
  10. Brutus the assassain, uh ... I mean "liberator"
  11. If it's an apple product, might I suggest "Eve"
  12. Totally at a loss on this one. Amman, Jordan?
  13. MPC ... now you know why I had to crop it down as much as I did.
  14. Gaius Octavius got it! Woo hoo! Oh, wait ... no, he didn't. Sorry.
  15. ... or after a hard day's work of killing one of the world's greatest mathematicians.
  16. To be clear though, you're not saying there could only be one imperator at a time though, are you? Like there would only be one emperor or one commander in chief? My understanding is that the term was conferred on a military commander (as opposed to a 'roman ruler') by his troops in order to acknowledge some significant victory, which in turn would allow him to claim a triumph.
×
×
  • Create New...