I just finnished the book, "The Last King" by Micheal Curtis Ford, about Mithridates. It was fiction, but M.C.F's other books seem to be very close to history for being fiction, so you would think that one would be too.Id never head of Mithridates, but I read the book and did some googles on him, and I have to ask, was he really that great? From what it sounds like, he won 2 littl battles againt the Romans, and was decemated in all the other battles, losing 10s of thousands while outnumbering Romes forces 30 or 50 to 1. It states how he conquered Roman cities or Provinces near and around Pontus, but it seemed like they were too small and out of the way for Rome to really care about, esp with the Civil War going on. Rome put him on the run almost the whole time he was in power, having to flee Pontus. His greatest achiviement I know of was besieging Athens, just to be totally destroyed by Sulla at Chareonea. The book and websites Ive seen compare him to Hannibal, and that just seems absurd. Was he really that great?