Our Fervidus must have seemed a threat to A. Patricius Romanus and the whole Roman order. There is a passage from Paul in which he states that " neither Greek nor Jew, male or female, slave or free..."
Precisely, Ludovicus, and that's the point I was attempting to get across with my little scenario of A. Patricius Romanus and his recently converted slave of Latin extraction. It could only seem to Romanus that his slave Fervidus was being somewhat presumptuous, in suddenly claiming to be "a part of a continuum of thousands of years of religious tradition" merely by virtue of having recently converted to the new cult.
No doubt in the East the Christian cult might have been tolerated as an off-shoot of Judaism. But to those back in the mother city of Roma, familiar (perhaps to the point of contempt) with the new converts coming primarily from the slave population and lower classes, I can't really see any such claims of religious precedence by the Roman Christians as being taken seriously and earning them the same level of tolerance granted to the Jews. Paul's assertion of neither Greek nor Jew was probably at least one thing that the Romans might agree on, regarding the Christians.
Sorry to take this a bit-off topic, folks. I now return you to the interesting discussion of Graeco-Roman influences and the American Revolution.
Is that why he included "the pursuit of happiness" in the Declaration?
I never thought of that before, but that does make sense and ties in quite well!
-- Nephele