No wonder this period is called the dark ages,why is it we dont know much about this time period?
We think there was a great British hero called arthur or artur or artorius,who checked the saxon invasion in the early 6th century.A book written about the conflict written in 540AD "gildas De excidio et conquestu Britanniae" doesnt even mention him! But there is some evidence supporting the legend,the survivng records show a large number of men named arthur,which suggests a sudden fashion for sons named after a famous man.Hardly conclussive evidence i know,the poem "Y Gododdin" was written around 600AD to celebrate the northern British victory over the saxons,he is mentioned in the poem very briefly.Now,we have to wait 200years before hes mentioned again,Nennius finished his "history of the Britons" in the year 799AD.Nennius never calls Arthur a king,he calls him the "Dux Bellorum"(leader of battles)probably means "Warlord" thats basically all the written evidence for arthur.In the 12th century Geoffrey of Monmoth wrote his mythical story of Arthur and the Holy Grail which is what most people associate Arthur with.All we can deduce is that a man named Arthur probably lived in the fifth,sixth century that was a great warlord who fought against the saxon invaders.
Britain at the time was a place racked byreligious dissent as well as by invasion and politics,there was a number of different kingdoms all with there own kings and religious beliefs,some were christian most were pagan,In the end the saxons won,the country became christian and we lost most of the true Arthur storys,so we,ll probably never know the truth.