Jump to content
UNRV Ancient Roman Empire Forums

Ursus

Plebes
  • Posts

    4,146
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Everything posted by Ursus

  1. Ursus

    Rubicon

    My only problem with Holland as a writer is that his books try too obviously to capitalize on recent headlines. "Rubicon" had hints that the loss of power from a Republican Senate to an imperial chief executive has a parallel in modern American foreign policy. In "Persian Fire" the author in his introduction made no bones about trying to find the genesis of the Western vs Islam conflict in the Greco-Persian wars. And now this latest book seems like an attempt to overlay modern events with Christian Europe's responses to its Islamic neighbors.
  2. Religion often follows power. Just as the Celts started honoring Romanized deities after Roman conquest, they could have gradually switched to Germans gods after Germanic conquest. The religious systems of the Celts and the Germans were not entirely different in any event. Along the Rhine border the Celts and the Germans seemed to have honored a few gods in common.
  3. Ursus

    Rubicon

    I hope you enjoy it. I didn't agree with all his interpretations but it was a joy to read.
  4. While I agree with your choice in Augustus, I have to ask: since when was being nice a criteria of measurement for the Romans? If the benchmark of Roman virtue was the original Brutus executing his sons for a conspiracy against the Republic, where does the state have room for being nice?
  5. For every person that does, there must be 10 that do not. Most people are too lazy to crack open a book. There are still a lot of people that take "The Da Vinci Code" as gospel.
  6. I've read Caesar and In the Name of Rome. It's obvious Goldworthy's strength lies as a military writer. As a writer of a general socio-political overview I feel he does less well. He could say more with less, I feel. Caesar could have been half as long and still conveyed the main points. Overturning established academic theories can be exciting, but only if the author has enough evidence to back up his assertions, and only if it is apparent the author truly believes in his assertions. I've read books where the author's contrary view was obviously nothing but a cynical and flimsy attempt to gain attention by naysaying the establishment. Such authors should be raked over the coals mercilessly as hacks.
  7. This book is currently on Amazon's bargain bin. http://www.amazon.com/Justinians-Flea-Plag...K8FZ9762734A0PK
  8. Congratulations. Seems like things are looking up for you.
  9. I wrote a brief overview of the transition here: http://www.unrv.com/government/command-of-...late-empire.php
  10. If it is any good I'll probably do a review. Great - you must tell me what you think of it. I thought it was a good summary of the state of the Empire during the Golden Age.
  11. I've been reading Ancient Egyptian history, culture and religion. Most of which probably wouldn't interest this lot. Although I may do an article on Alexandria as the second city of the empire.
  12. Of all the ones above that I have read, I recommend Southern most strongly as the most informative and easy to read. Now this one I was not aware of. I found a cheap used copy and ordered it from Amazon. Thanks, NN.
  13. BTW, the apocrypha ia easily available online: New Testament apocrypha: http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/apocrypha.html Old Testament apocrypha: http://wesley.nnu.edu/biblical_studies/non...n/apocrypha.htm Book of Enoch: http://www.heaven.net.nz/writings/enoch.htm
  14. What went into the canonical version of the Bible and what didn't was a matter of lively debate among the early Church Fathers. The Book of Enoch, for instance, which tells of naughty Angels copulating with human females, was widely read by early Christians, but didn't make the final cut. The Book of Revelations was also controversial and seems to have nearly not made the final version - it is astonishing to think how different some segments of modern Protestantism would be if they had never read of that particular book (they might not even exist for that matter).
  15. If I ever get married, I just it want it to be me, her. both sets of parents, and a judge. Followed by 2 weeks of hanky panky at some undisclosed location.
  16. Dark chocolate and dark beer. And dark Google!
  17. Check out some of the threads here: http://www.unrv.com/forum/index.php?showforum=57 (we really need to make the libri section more visible)
  18. http://entertainment.msn.com/news/article....mp;affid=100055
  19. http://www.blackpoolcitizen.co.uk/display....sewer_works.php
  20. "Bad sex, it is said, is still pretty good, insofar as it is preferable to no sex at all. Unfortunately one cannot say the same thing about bad history. One spends too long in anticipation and preparation; the actual event proceeds rather clumsily; and when the climax (such as it is) finally arrives, one gets the sense it was hardly worth it. I do not mean to suggest that I am UNRV's resident expert on bad sex, but after watching the 2nd season of "Rome" I know a thing or two about bad history. The problem with "Rome" is precisely that its sex is better than its history and left me feeling like a dirty whore for watching it."... http://www.unrv.com/hbo-rome-second-season-review.php
  21. Joanne Berry, The Complete Pompeii. London: Thames & Hudson, 2007. Pp. 256; ills. 318 (275 in color). ISBN 978-0-500-05150-4. $40.00. Reviewed by Wakefield Foster, University of Missouri-Columbia (wakefieldfoster@...) Word count: 2358 words ------------------------------- To read a print-formatted version of this review, see http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/bmcr/2008/2008-03-33.html ------------------------------- Joanne Berry has spent many years working at the archaeological sites of Pompeii and Herculaneum (Unpeeling Pompeii: Studies in Region I of Pompeii, edited by Joanne Berry [Milan: Electa, 1998]), and her enthusiasm for the mystique and wonder of these ancient cities' unexpected treasures is evident on every page of The Complete Pompeii.[[1]] The strength of Berry's book is in its wide range of information on the subject, concisely and thoughtfully arranged to appeal to scholars and teachers -- classicists, archaeologists, and historians -- as well as to students and the layman. Her choice of illustrations deftly supports the text and elicits the reader's continuing interest. The Complete Pompeii provides background information about the "discovery" of Pompeii in the early eighteenth century, though local inhabitants had always called the site, a sixty-or-more acre field, Civita (which Berry renders as La Civita\). Berry begins by summarizing what we already know of Pompeii and outlines, often in close detail, what we are learning from ongoing work of the lives and deaths of the city's inhabitants. Her purpose is clearly to present in a single volume an up-to-date account of the facts and controversies surrounding Pompeii in the early twenty-first century. Regarding the often unintelligible and confusing mass of archaeological remains of public and private buildings and public spaces, Berry has a distinct talent for gleaning valuable insights about the ancient Pompeians' daily lives. The author astutely interweaves her information about the site with past and more recent political and historical background circumstances. The saga of Pompeii's excavations has always been inextricably tied to political contexts from Charles VII of Palermo to Mussolini. Pompeii remains arguably the most important civic monument in Italian culture and has been exploited to this end for good and bad. The Complete Pompeii begins with a chapter titled "Disaster in the Shadow of Vesuvius", which describes how Pompeii (and Herculaneum) were destroyed by the eruption of Vesuvius in AD 79. Berry reproduces in full the two letters by Pliny the Younger who described to Tacitus what he had seen from a distance -- the distinctive "umbrella pine" shape of the cloud which has given modern vulcanologists the term "Plinian" for this early phase of an eruption. The author includes other ancient references to Vesuvius, including suspicions by some observers (Strabo, Vitruvius, and Diodorus Siculus) that Vesuvius may have been an active volcano in its past. This is interesting because it suggests that not everyone at the time was surprised by what happened. Suetonius and Dio Cassius describe an admirably organized relief effort overseen by the emperor Titus, a disaster relief operation which apparently puts to shame FEMA's efforts in New Orleans. Chapter Two, "Rediscovering Pompeii's Buried Past", provides background information about the first digs, or rather plundering, of the site, which seems to have been discovered, at least in the modern era, in 1708. Berry points out, however, that extensive tunneling found beneath the hardened ash, lapilli, and tufa may date to soon after the eruption when the city's inhabitants returned in search of their possessions. Sadly, as Berry writes, Pompeii suffered much irreparable destruction, both to the site and to artifacts buried within it, when haphazard digging, often by fortune hunters, uncovered, re-covered, shuffled, and re-shuffled discarded piles of detritus, thus obliterating find-spots of artifacts that were later returned. The first modern consideration for the condition of the digs is found in a letter by Horace Walpole in 1740, in which he deplores "the lack of judicious direction over the recovery of this reservoir of antiquities. . . . If only a man of learning had the inspection of it and directed the working, and would make a journal of it" (40.) Chapter Three, "Birth and Growth of a Roman Town", examines the recent upsurge in interest in Pompeii's history before the eruption of AD 79. A number of strategically chosen stratigraphic excavations are being carried out in different parts of the town in an effort to establish a chronology of settlements by Oscans, Greeks, Etruscans, and Samnites before Pompeii came under Roman control in 290 BC (64-66). Interestingly, a Bronze Age settlement in the region of Campania near the present site of Nola had been destroyed sometime in the fourth millennium BC by an eruption of Vesuvius. Berry's focus in Chapter Four ("The People of Pompeii") is aimed at the inhabitants of Pompeii. She estimates the population at between eight and twelve thousand people, consisting of the freeborn, freedmen, and slaves. The city's racial diversity was apparently not as mixed as expected for a port city. Romans predominated alongside much smaller numbers of Oscans and Greeks. Berry asserts that some evidence may point to the presence of a Jewish and/or Christian community in Pompeii and Herculaneum, such as the names Mary and Martha inscribed on walls and some few Semitic inscriptions on amphorae, which, of course, may only indicate the presence of Jewish traders. She admits that the paucity of evidence makes the suggestion of a Jewish community very unlikely (201). Although many houses of the elite have separate slave quarters, it has long been a question whether and how slaves were buried. Berry points out interestingly that "there is evidence to suggest that some slaves at least were buried in the family tombs of their masters" (91). A popular window into daily life in Pompeii has long been provided by its variety of graffiti, ranging from the vulgar (Phoebus the perfumer fucks the best) to the pragmatic (A brass pot disappeared from this shop. If anyone brings it back, he'll be rewarded with 65 sesterces), and including drawings and caricatures.[[2]] It remains unknown how many people in the Roman empire could read and write, but the fact of over 11,000 examples of the written word at Pompeii suggests that a considerable number of Pompeians could, at the very least, read and write at a rudimentary level. Berry interprets a wall painting from the house of Julia Felix as a school scene; it depicts a row of boys sitting (out of doors) in the Forum with wax tablets on their knees while another boy receives a caning by the schoolmaster. The reviewer is particularly grateful for Berry's inclusion, though necessarily limited, of erotic scenes from the infamous "secret cabinet" in the Naples Museum in the form of paintings, sculpture, and mosaics, as well as a more extended section (112-119) discussing the roles of women in Pompeian life. Chapter Five ("Life in the Public Eye") deals with public life, the dynamics of which can be studied in surprising detail at Pompeii. Reputations and status were enhanced for individuals who won public office. Particularly unique to Pompeii and found in great numbers are "programmata" or posters painted in red or black on white background supporting specific candidates for public office. Berry writes that, based on their freshness at the time of excavation, we know the names of leading candidates for the aedileship (junior magistracy) in AD 79. Berry devotes several pages to descriptions and color plates of the theaters of Herculaneum and Pompeii. Remarkably, a large arena-shaped depression in Civita was repeatedly dismissed by mid-eighteenth-century excavators as simply a low spot in the field, and it was not until much later that archaeologists revealed it to be Pompeii's beautifully preserved amphitheater. Pompeii boasted a covered theater, or Odeon, the roof of which would have greatly enhanced acoustics, making it an attractive and forgiving venue for reading poetry and rhetoric (124), and an open-air theater was found next to it. A new fashion for porticoed buildings in Augustan Italy may be evident, Berry suggests, in the similarities between the porticoed Eumachia Building (excavated in 1822 -- its function debated ever since) and the portico around Pompeii's forum. The basilica with portico at Herculaneum is another, though controversial, example. Although we can study the structure and often the decoration and contents of Pompeian houses, we remain far removed from being able to reconstruct the composition of individual households, their domestic organization, and the activities that took place within the houses (154). Other recent scholarship makes less problematic the topic of domestic organization.[[3]] In Chapter Six ("Houses and Society"), besides houses and their inhabitants, Berry examines wall paintings, mosaics, and garden layouts and offers sumptuous color photos of many of the lesser known mosaics and wall paintings. Many of the finest examples of mosaics are found in Pompeii and Herculaneum where they have been described as "carpets," since emblems are often placed at their centers. She provides a detailed and informative outline of the four styles of Pompeian wall-painting from 150 BC to AD 79 (170-71). Of course, Berry lavishes a much deserved attention on the House of the Faun, which was certainly one of the wealthiest and most luxurious houses in Pompeii: "Originally excavated in 1830-32, the House of the Faun was stripped of its elaborate mosaics by the excavators, abandoned to the elements, and finally damaged in the Allied bombing of 1943. What can be seen today only hints at the grandeur of the 32,000 square foot house, the largest in Pompeii" (163). Lastly, Berry devotes several pages to the domestic gardens of Pompeian houses and to descriptions and photographs of a sampling of the thousands of household objects of unknown provenance stored at the Naples Museum. In Chapter Seven ("Gods, Temples, and Cults") Berry examines what can be reconstructed about public religious and cult practices in Pompeii. Apparently, Venus held the most popularity in the town: "More statuettes and wall-paintings [of Venus] have been found in the houses and streets of Pompeii than any other deity" (195). Of course, these may only be ornaments, since statuettes and wall-paintings of Dionysus are also found at the site. After 80 BC, when Pompeii became an official Roman colony, Roman temples or existing temples that had been Romanized dominated, although other, local deities retained some of their earlier importance along with certain approved "foreign" cults such as that of Isis. However, excavations even in the early eighteenth century were well documented, though the sites were usually looted of objects of value such as wall-paintings. Early visitors often made drawings of the paintings and the original excavators kept documentation so that in recent years there has been considerable success in reconstructing the original find-spots of looted material, and we have a good idea of what the temple looked like in AD 79 (205). The oldest temple is the Augustan Temple of Fortuna Augusta. From the Augustan period onward, public religion included gods directly associated with the emperors, both dead and alive (192). Berry describes these as "civic" or "state" cults that had little to do with personal religious practice and more to do with allegiance to Rome. Archaeological evidence dates two temples to the 6th century BC, the Doric Temple, and the Temple of Apollo. She reports that there may also be compelling evidence for a temple to Mephitis, the Samnite goddess of love (188). A fourth temple predating the Roman period and established by Samnite magistrates in the 3rd century BC is the Temple of Bacchus, outside Pompeii at Sant' Abbondio. Of course, every Pompeian family had in its home a special shrine -- the lararium -- honoring its own protective deities -- the Lares. Chapter Eight is titled "Economic Life in a Roman Town". The so-called "Via dell'Abbondanza" is the longest and was apparently the busiest street in Pompeii. Lined with shops of every kind, it stretched from the Forum to the Sarno Gate and the Amphitheater (210). Because of the region's volcanic soil, the fertility of Pompeii's land was renowned in antiquity. Wine was the town's principal product, but fruit and nut trees and vegetables were cultivated also. Berry includes a comprehensive list of occupations attested at Pompeii in inscriptions, graffiti, and wax tablets (221). Fittingly, the book ends with "The Last Years of Pompeii". The quality of life in Pompeii's last years was severely impaired by a devastating earthquake in AD 63 or 62 (the issue is still debated) that lasted for several days and was clearly a premonitory sign of the eruption of 79. Berry summarizes thus: "The 16 years from this earthquake in AD 63 to the eruption of Vesuvius in AD 79 were marked by disruption as the inhabitants of the town attempted to rebuild their lives, and endured further seismic activity" (234). Although many inhabitants, both rich and poor, undoubtedly left the city in disgust after the 63/62 earthquakes, the majority clearly remained to face the final catastrophe in AD 79. We have two ancient reports of the seriousness of the earthquake, one by the historian Tacitus and the other, in much greater detail, by Seneca, the philosopher and tutor to the young Nero. In fact, Berry notes, Seneca's description of the town's destruction has been fundamental to the modern discussion of living conditions in the last years of Pompeii's life (236). Berry is to be commended for producing a book that concisely gathers in a single volume a wide variety of enlightening aspects of the famous city destroyed and yet preserved in many ways that shed light on first-century Roman life. The physical quality of the book is exquisite -- satin gloss pages generously interspersed with color photographs ranging from aerial shots to rarely shown artifacts (for example, preserved organic material such as boiled eggs, which I have never seen in my several visits to the Pompeii collection in the Naples museum). I recommend the book to all audiences and especially to university or secondary school Latin teachers, who will find it most valuable when introducing their students to the Younger Pliny's famous letters to the historian Tacitus, describing the events that led to his uncle's death on the beach at Stabiae. More than anything, however, the book is a comprehensive survey of what is arguably the most famous archaeological site in the world. Printer's errors: p. 40: ". . . exciting finds made been made in . . ." should read ". . . exciting finds had been made in . . ." p. 219: ". . . such asa chisel" should read ". . . such as a chisel." ------------------ Notes: 1. A spate of new books on Pompeii has come out recently (e.g., Dobbins and Foss, above; Alex Butterworth, Pompeii: The Living City [New York: St. Martin's Press, 2006] and Allison Cooley, Pompeii [London: Duckworth, 2003]), among which Berry's The Complete Pompeii easily holds it own because of its broad scope and appealing admixture of constituent text and illustrations. 2. There are a number of rather humorous graffiti that Berry didn't include which might have added pleasantly to her list, such as "miximus in lecto; fateor, peccavimus, hospes. Si dicis quare, nulla matella fuit," ("I confess, innkeeper, that I did bad. I pissed in your bed. If you want to know why, it's because there wasn't any pot!") [Walter H. Marks, Claimed By Vesuvius (Wellesley Hill, MA: The Independent School Press, 1975), 27]. 3. For example, see J.-A. Dickmann, "Residences in Herculaneum." In The World of Pompeii, John J. Dobbins and Pedar W. Foss, eds (London: Routledge, July 2007); Stephan T.A.M. Mols, Eric M. Moormann, Omni pede stare. Saggi architettonici e circumvesuviani in memoriam Jos de Waele. Studi della Soprintendenza archeologica di Pompei 9 (Naples: Electa Napoli and Ministero per i Beni e le Attivita\ Culturali, 2005); and Penelope Mary Allison, The Archaeology of Household Activities (London: Routledge, 1999). ------------------------------- The BMCR website (http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/bmcr/) contains a complete and searchable archive of BMCR reviews since our first issue in 1990. Please do not reply to this email as this is an unmonitored mailbox. You can contact us by sending e-mail to classrev@.... To subscribe to or unsubscribe from this list, visit http://newmailman.brynmawr.edu/mailman/listinfo/bmcr-l. To unsubscribe, you may also send a blank e-mail to bmcr-l-request@... with the word Unsubscribe in the subject line. _______________________________________________ BMCR-L mailing list BMCR-L@... http://newmailman.brynmawr.edu/mailman/listinfo/bmcr-l
  22. I've read enough about the early emperors. I'd like to get know Sejanus. And maybe give him a helping hand - I often wondered what the empire would be like with him at the helm rather than the gradually degenerating Julio-Claudian dynasty.
  23. I find most of the comparisons a bit overstated. Usually they are advocated by those who see Rome as an immoral imperialist menace and who would like to paint modern America as such. I find parallels with Carthaginian history and international economic strategy a little more compelling, but only a little. As far as American government, there are a lot of parallels drawn to ancient Rome. But the American colonials were ex British whose immediate experience was with the British system of government. And so we have an upper house and a lower house like the British parliament, and our president a median between a king and prime minister. Our legal system is very much part of the English speaking common law tradition as well.
  24. Etruscan power was waning. The Greek cities in the south of Italy had defeated them in battle. Another one of those foundation myths was that the Etruscan king raped a virtuous Roman woman, inspiring the Roman nobles to avenge her honor. This is again probably mere poetry, but a rebellion of Roman aristocrats against a foreign king in conjunction with declining Etruscan power seems likely.
  25. Dark chocolate is so much better than milk chocolate.
×
×
  • Create New...