Jump to content
UNRV Ancient Roman Empire Forums

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 08/06/2022 in all areas

  1. Not at all. Take gladiators for instance. Professional lanistas weren't the only owners, military officers used them as bodyguards and trainers, even private citizens sometimes had a troupe among their possessions for rent. Cicero, in one of his letters, praises his friend Atticus for the splendid troupe he owns. But then I suppose the association with virile masculinity more than compensated for official infamy. Prostitutes might be a little different. Wealthy men could of course have any slave they wanted on demand. Wives would suffer of course, that was not the correct behaviour of a Roman matron. I do note however that some of the urban villas in Pompeii have alcoves in the back wall which they could rent to prostitutes quietly. Let's not speak about that eh?
    1 point
  2. The laurel wreath has a cultural significance. The Roman imagery would seem to be associating good sex with victory and success. I get spurious emails from weirdos claiming the same today.
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...